New research links wildfire smoke to increased risk of emergency room visits for people of all ages.
Annie Doubleday doesn’t want her work to scare people. It’s already unsettling when wildfire smoke descends upon a community, when eyes burn and throats scratch and people trickle into emergency rooms. She’d rather people see her research, which ties wildfire smoke to an increased risk of emergency department visits, as a step toward protecting themselves.
“I think it’s useful to see it as more information, and use that to help us figure out what we can do to protect ourselves,” says Doubleday, who completed the research while working toward her doctorate in environmental health at the University of Washington and now works on air quality for the Washington State Department of Health.
“For me the takeaway is we’re all at risk of health impacts. Obviously some more than others, such as those with pre-existing respiratory or cardiovascular conditions, but we all should be taking steps to reduce exposure and watching for any symptoms.”
That’s the crux of two papers recently published in Environmental Research: Health, which found an increased risk of hospital service encounters in the days following wildfire smoke events. Taken together, their findings suggest that wildfire smoke poses a risk to people of all ages, not just young children and older adults.
The researchers found that the risk of respiratory-related emergency department encounters increased most sharply for those between the ages of 19 and 64. The findings suggest that public health messaging should also target younger and middle-aged adults, who may not see themselves as vulnerable to wildfire smoke.
“We do have this younger age group in there who may think they’re invincible, or that the risk messaging doesn’t apply to them because they’re not very young or elderly,” says Tania Busch Isaksen, teaching professor of environmental and occupational health sciences at and coauthor of both papers. Isaksen is also co-director of the Collaborative on Extreme Event Resilience, which has produced a string of papers on the risks of wildfire smoke.
“Knowing that essentially all age groups are at risk of negative health outcomes during wildfire smoke events is an important finding and a shift in how we think of who is vulnerable in our population during these events,” Busch Isaksen says. “I expect these results will be informative to public health risk communication strategies aimed at reducing wildfire smoke exposure in all age groups through behavior change such as limiting time outdoors, actively cleaning your indoor air, etc. ”
The first study, led by Doubleday, analyzed emergency department (ED) data from hospitals across Washington state. It found an increased risk of respiratory-related ED visits, including visits for asthma, in the five days following a smoke event. Researchers also observed a delayed increase in the odds of cardiovascular-related ED visits.
The analysis also found a correlation between the amount of smoke in the air and the risk of ED encounters. For every 10 µgm−3 increase in the concentration of fine particle pollution—PM2.5 or particulate matter 2.5 micrometers or smaller—the odds of ED visits rose accordingly.
The second study, led by recent University of Washington graduate Daaniya Iyaz, is among the first to document the health effects of wildfire smoke on children in Washington state. It analyzed 15 years of data from Seattle Children’s Hospital’s emergency department and in-patient hospital admissions, comparing rates of visits on days with and without smoke.
Researchers linked wildfire smoke events to a 7% increase in the odds of all-cause hospital admissions. Notably, the odds of hospitalization remained elevated in the week after smoke events, highlighting the need to monitor children’s symptoms well after exposure.
“We definitely want to be more cognizant of exposure when it comes to children during wildfire smoke season,” says Iyaz, who earned a master’s in environmental health from the UW and now works in extreme heat mitigation for King County. “After children are exposed to wildfire smoke, keep monitoring symptoms for a couple of days, because they can lag, especially if there are underlying health conditions that might contribute.”
The study did not find any change in visits to the emergency department, which researchers attributed to the unique population served by Seattle Children’s. As a Level I trauma center, the hospital draws medically complicated cases from across the region, so its patients may be at greater risk of hospitalization than the general population. Parents may also be more likely to bring a sick child to the nearest emergency room, where their visit wouldn’t be captured by this specific dataset.
Even before these papers were published, the findings began to show real-world impacts on public health. Iyaz designed an easy-to-read summary of how smoke can affect children’s health, so patients’ families can better prepare for future events.
“Wildfire smoke days are relatively new, and not all people may understand them,” Iyaz says. “If people aren’t aware of what wildfire smoke is and the impacts it can have, that makes it more important to meet communities where they are and talk about what the health effects can be.”
Source: Alden Woods for University of Washington
