Smoke from a Siberian wildfire may have transported enough nitrogen to parts of the Arctic Ocean to amplify a phytoplankton bloom, according to a new study.
The work sheds light on some potential ecological effects from Northern Hemisphere wildfires, particularly as these fires become larger, longer, and more intense.
In the summer of 2014, satellite imagery detected a larger than normal algal bloom in the Laptev Sea, located in the Arctic Ocean approximately 850 kilometers (528 miles) south of the North Pole.
“For a bloom that large to occur, the area would need a substantial influx of new nitrogen supply, as the Arctic Ocean is nitrogen-depleted,” says Douglas Hamilton, assistant professor of marine, earth, and atmospheric sciences at North Carolina State University, as well as co-first author of the study in Communications Earth & Environment. “So we needed to figure out where that nitrogen was coming from.”
Hamilton conducted the work as a research associate at Cornell University.
First, the researchers looked at the “usual suspects” for nitrogen input, such as sea ice melt, river discharge, and ocean upwelling, but didn’t find anything that would account for the amount of nitrogen necessary for the bloom to occur.
But during that same time period, exceptionally large wildfires in Siberia, Russia, located directly upwind of the bloom, had burned approximately 1.5 million hectares (or about 3.5 million acres) of land.
So the researchers turned their attention to atmospheric composition. They used the Community Earth System Model (CESM), a computer model that can simulate what happens to emissions from natural and human sources as they enter and leave the atmosphere.
They fed information about wind, temperature, and atmospheric composition—including the composition of wildfire smoke—from the time period in question—into the model.
The model simulations showed that during late July and August of 2014—when the bloom was detected and the Siberian wildfire was burning—nitrogen deposition from the atmosphere was almost double that of the preceding and following years.
“The wildfires were located in rapidly warming boreal regions, which have a lot of peat in the thawing permafrost,” Hamilton says. “Peat is very nitrogen rich and the smoke from the burning peat was hypothesized as the most likely source of much of the additional nitrogen.”
“We’ve known that fires can impact phytoplankton blooms, though it is unexpected to see something like this in the Arctic Ocean,” says Mathieu Ardyna, co-first author and CNRS researcher at the International Research Laboratory Takuvik (CNRS/Laval University).
“Most likely, since fires are locality-specific and difficult to predict, blooms like this won’t be the norm—but when these wildfires do occur the nutrients they bring in could lead to sustained or multiple blooms.”
The researchers’ next steps could include reviewing the historical satellite record and further characterizing the chemical composition of the particles within the smoke to get a clearer picture of how wildfires like these might impact different ecosystems.
“A one-off bloom like this won’t change ecosystem structure, but both Siberia and high arctic Canada are getting more wildfires,” Hamilton says. “So it may be interesting to explore potential downstream effects if fire activity and nutrient supply remain high.”
The Department of Energy, the Alg-O-Nord research project of the CNES (Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales), High Impact Publications Program of ArcticNet, and a European Union’s Horizon 2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant funded the work.
Source: NC State
