Researchers suspected as much early on in the pandemic, but for something as large and complex as the seafood industry, the trends were not so obvious. As a result, financial assistance in that direction has been slow.
“Seafood is part of the narrative that I would say doesn’t get as much attention as something like agriculture,” says Halley Froehlich, aquaculture and fisheries professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara and an author of the study in the journal Fish and Fisheries.
“And that certainly appears to be the case when we’re looking at something like the CARES Act, the federal funding source specifically passed to provide economic relief in the US,” she says.
That is, in large part, due to the fact that policymakers lack sufficient real-time data to see how the seafood industry has fared in the time of lockdowns and social distancing, says lead author Easton White, an ecologist at the University of Vermont.
“One difficulty is that a lot of this data isn’t released until months and years later,” White says. From the boat to the table, data is generated that must be gathered and processed before it gets released, he says.
The pandemic is a rapidly evolving situation and the seafood industry can’t afford to wait. So, to get a big-picture look at the early effects of COVID-19 on US fisheries and seafood consumption, the researchers synthesized multiple sources from across the seafood supply chain, including some unconventional real-time data sets.
“We looked for different indicators of the effects of COVID on seafood and fisheries in general,” White says. In addition to federal fisheries reports and customs data, the researchers looked to news reports and Google search trends for seafood and seafood market foot traffic.
Seafood-to-go picks up some slack
As had happened for virtually every industry at the start of the pandemic, the lockdowns and closures caused a huge drop in economic activity for the seafood sector, from which many still struggle to recover. Using data from January to September 2020, the researchers calculated a 40% decline in fresh seafood catches, a 37% decline in imports, and a 43% drop in exports relative to the same time last year. Because the US is one of the top exporters and importers of seafood, the researchers say they expect the impacts will reverberate across the globe.
Closer to home, demand from restaurants—the main driver of seafood spending in the US—virtually disappeared as establishments locked down. Seafood market foot traffic declined steeply as well. The effects were uneven across fisheries and aquaculture operations.
“Large-scale production systems that have large networks were able to pivot really fast,” Froehlich says. “And so if they couldn’t sell in one location, they were more easily able to sell to a different location. They felt the impacts, but not as much as the small scale fisheries that then had to depend on looking for local buyers.”
Frozen seafood products, “were generally less affected,” according to the paper.
One interesting development has been the uptick in seafood delivery and takeout, which has picked up some, but not all, of the slack in restaurant demand.
“It’s unclear to us the level of substitution and what it means in the long term, especially how people are consuming seafood at home,” says Froehlich, who is interested in how this consumption pattern might influence the demand for certain species over time.
Stressed seafood supply chain
Because of COVID-19’s variable effects across the entire seafood industry, future federal support should aim at locations and sub-sectors “most affected by the pandemic: fishery-dependent communities, processors, and fisheries and aquaculture that focus on fresh products,” the researchers say.
“A lot of communities are dependent on fisheries,” White says. “There are fisheries for tourism, for livelihoods, and a lot of indigenous communities focus on fishing. And it’s not just fishing but also fish processing, all the different people that are involved. If you have COVID popping up just when you’re about to go fishing and make all the money you’re going to have for the year, now you can’t make any of that.”
“COVID-19 is a huge risk to the big factory boats that both catch and process fish in our waters—this combines the worst risks of cruise ships and meat plants,” says Trevor Branch, associate professor in the School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences at the University of Washington. “Their workers need priority access to the new vaccines.”
The pandemic has highlighted some of the stress points in the US’s seafood supply chain, the researchers say. Preserving a diversity of the sub-sectors within the seafood industry—for instance, small local operations as well as large fisheries—will keep the entire system resilient to shocks.
“If you have locally-sourced seafood, if you have aquaculture and fisheries, if you have small-scale and large-scale, this is a little more robust,” White says.
This study to come out of the wealth of data the researchers gathered. A parallel study will appear in the journal Marine Policy that examines how policy, particularly the new federal seafood acts and executive orders, can support more integrated management and diversification of the US seafood sector. The researchers hope the information will help guide the rebuilding of the flagging US seafood industry to be more resilient to future shocks, including climate change impacts.
“As new mandates and legislation around fisheries and aquaculture are being rolled out during COVID-19 at the national and state levels, we have an opportunity to really think about what the actual targets and goals are. How do we build in more resilience now, instead of retroactively, when the system gets disrupted again,” Froehlich says. “Because it will.”
Additional coauthors are from American University, the University of Michigan, the University of Victoria, UC Santa Barbara, and the University of Washington.
Source: UC Santa Barbara
