New research suggests that, as intensive groundwater pumping makes the ground sink, it also allows arsenic to move into groundwater aquifers that supply drinking water for 1 million people.
For decades, intensive groundwater pumping has caused ground beneath California’s San Joaquin Valley to sink, damaging infrastructure.
In their new work, researchers found that satellite-derived measurements of ground sinking could predict arsenic concentrations in groundwater. This technique could be an early warning system to prevent dangerous levels of arsenic contamination in aquifers with certain characteristics worldwide.
“We’re just starting to recognize that this is a danger…”
“Arsenic in groundwater has been a problem for a really long time,” says lead author Ryan Smith, a doctoral candidate in geophysics at Stanford University’s School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences.
It’s naturally present in Earth’s crust and a frequent concern in groundwater management because of its ubiquity and links to heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and other illnesses. “But the idea that overpumping for irrigation could increase arsenic concentrations is new,” Smith says.
Importantly, the group found signs that aquifers contaminated as a result of overpumping can recover if withdrawals stop. Areas that showed slower sinking compared to 15 years earlier also had lower arsenic levels.
“Groundwater must have been largely turned over,” says coauthor Scott Fendorf, a professor of Earth system science and a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment.
A sinking feeling
The research team analyzed arsenic data for hundreds of wells in two different drought periods alongside centimeter-level estimates of land subsidence, or sinking, captured by satellites. They found that when land in the San Joaquin Valley’s Tulare basin sinks faster than 3 inches per year, the risk of finding hazardous arsenic levels in groundwater as much as triples.
Aquifers in the Tulare basin are made up of sand and gravel zones separated by thin layers of clay. The clay acts like a sponge, holding tight to water as well as arsenic soaked up from ancient river sediments. Unlike the sand and gravel layers, these clays contain relatively little oxygen, which creates conditions for arsenic to be in a form that dissolves easily in water.
When pumping draws too much water from the sand and gravel areas, the aquifer compresses and land sinks.
“Sands and gravels that were being propped apart by water pressure are now starting to squeeze down on that sponge,” Fendorf explains. Arsenic-rich water then starts to seep out and mix with water in the main aquifer.
When water pumping slows enough to put the brakes on subsidence—and relieve the squeeze on trapped arsenic—clean water soaking in from streams, rain, and natural runoff at the surface can gradually flush the system clean.
However, coauthor Rosemary Knight, a professor of geophysics and affiliated faculty at the Woods Institute, warns against banking too much on a predictable recovery from overpumping.
Device makes clean water with paper and sunlight
“How long it takes to recover is going to be highly variable and dependent upon so many factors,” she says.
The researchers say overpumping in other aquifers could produce the same contamination issues seen in the San Joaquin Valley if they have three attributes: alternating layers of clay and sand; a source of arsenic; and relatively low oxygen content, which is common in aquifers located beneath thick clays.
The threat may be more widespread than once thought. Only in the last few years have scientists discovered that otherwise well-aerated aquifers considered largely immune to arsenic problems can in fact be laced with clays that have the low oxygen levels necessary for arsenic to move into most groundwater.
“We’re just starting to recognize that this is a danger,” says Fendorf.
Warning system
The revelation that remote sensing can raise an alarm before contamination threatens human health offers hope for better water monitoring.
“Instead of having to drill wells and take water samples back to the lab, we have a satellite getting the data we need,” says Knight.
While well data is important to validate and calibrate satellite data, she explains, on-the-ground monitoring can never match the breadth and speed of remote sensing.
“You’re never sampling a well frequently enough to catch that arsenic the moment it’s in the well,” says Knight. “So how fantastic to have this remote sensing early warning system to let people realize that they’re approaching a critical point in terms of water quality.”
The study builds on research led in 2013 by Laura Erban, then a doctoral student working in Vietnam’s Mekong Delta. “That’s where we started saying, ‘Oh no,'” says Fendorf, who was a coauthor of that paper.
Treating water for one toxic thing can create another
As in the San Joaquin Valley, areas of the Mekong Delta where land was sinking more showed higher arsenic concentrations.
“Now we have two sites in totally different geographic regions where the same mechanisms appear to be operating,” says Fendorf. “That sends a trigger that we need to be thinking about managing groundwater and making sure that we’re not overdrafting the aquifers.”
The National Science Foundation and the US Department of Energy funded the work.
Source: Josie Garthwaite for Stanford University
