Pandemic puts certain groups in high-hazard work

Women hold two-thirds of the jobs in the harshest category of work, according to new report on Washington workers during the pandemic.

The researchers looked at data on demographics, working conditions, wages and benefits, and risks of exposure to disease.

“The big takeaway from our research is how particularly women are working under precarious conditions,” says David West, coauthor of the report and an analyst at the Washington Labor Education and Research Center. “A large number of women are both facing safety risks at high-hazard jobs and are economically at risk.”

The report, by researchers from the labor center at South Seattle College’s Georgetown campus and the University of Washington’s School of Public Health, initially set out to understand the risks workers faced in jobs that Governor Jay Inslee deemed essential as the pandemic took hold in Washington. Officials asked people to remain in their homes and closed many businesses.

But as the state began its phased reopening, nonessential workers started returning to the workplace, and the researchers found that many of those workers also faced a high risk of exposure to disease and economic stress.

In the end, the researchers identified 55 of the 694 occupations on which they had data as both precarious—facing economic and health care stress—and high risk of exposure to the coronavirus. Out of a total Washington workforce of 3.3 million workers, some 900,000 fill positions in these 55 occupations. These workers, 70% in essential jobs, were not only mostly female, but also disproportionately workers of color.

“There are a lot of workers in Washington who are at increased risk for exposure to COVID-19 and still going to work. And those workers tend to also be workers who have a lack of workplace protections and are either women or workers of color,” says Marissa Baker, coauthor of the labor report and an assistant professor in the environmental and occupational health sciences department at the University of Washington.

“So, we really need to ensure that there are targeted policies or regulations to help these workers, especially since we now know who they are and what occupations and industries they fall into,” Baker says.

In order to determine which occupations were at higher risk of exposure to COVID-19 and to make specific recommendations related to workplace safety, the researchers looked at the importance of these “key dimensions” of a job:

Physical proximity to others
Dealings with external customers
Face-to-face discussions
Contact with others
Exposure to disease/infections
Work with a team or group
Dealings with physically aggressive people
Assisting/caring for others
Performing for/working directly with the public
Use of common or specialized safety equipment (gloves, masks, hazmat suits)

The authors list in their report a series of policies designed to address these health risks as well as the economic challenges they recommend policymakers and business leaders adopt.

Their key recommendations are:

Airborne transmissible disease (ATD) standard: Washington should follow the lead of states such as California that have enacted ATD standards for their workplaces, instead of relying on voluntary guidance.
Workplace coronavirus disclosure, testing, and tracking: Support comprehensive notification of positive workplace COVID tests, workplace testing, and prioritize workplace follow-up tracking.
Safety committees: Promote and widely enforce the Washington state requirement that workplaces with more than 11 employees have safety committees in order to involve workers in identifying and preventing COVID risk factors.
Economic security: Ensure that all Washington at-risk/precarious workers have affordable access to health insurance, hazard pay, paid leave for quarantine periods, and affordable child care to reduce stress and ensure prompt care.

“Even though this has been a devastating time for the American workforce,” Baker says, “we can harness this moment and make big structural changes that can forever improve the relationship between work and health.”

Mike Mulcahy of Working Title Research is a coauthor.

Source: University of Washington