Greenspace has a positive impact on a key genetic marker associated with exposure to stress, a study finds.
However, the study also finds that the positive impact of greenspace—the vegetation in a neighborhood’s yards, parks, and public spaces—isn’t enough to compensate for other environmental challenges like air pollution.
“Greenspace is tremendously valuable for a community, but it is not enough to overcome systemic racism…”
The markers in question are telomeres, which are sections of repetitive DNA found at each end of a chromosome that serve to protect the ends of the chromosomes from damage. However, each time a cell divides, the telomeres inside those cells become slightly shorter. Once the telomeres become so short that the cell cannot divide successfully, the cell dies.
“This makes telomeres important markers of biological age, or how worn down our cells are,” says Scott Ogletree, corresponding author of the study and a former postdoctoral researcher at North Carolina State University’s Center for Geospatial Analytics. “And we know that many variables—such as stress—can influence how quickly our telomeres wear down.” Ogletree is now a lecturer at the University of Edinburgh.
“There’s a lot of research that talks about the various ways in which greenspace is beneficial, and a lot of research that talks about adverse health effects associated with pollution, racist segregation in housing, and other social and environmental challenges,” says Aaron Hipp, coauthor of the study and a professor of parks, recreation, and tourism management at NC State. “This study was an attempt to quantify the beneficial impacts of greenspace at the cellular level, and the extent to which greenspace can help to offset environmental harms.”
For the study, researchers drew on data from the CDC’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the years 1999-2002. NHANES is a longitudinal, nationally representative study that assesses the health of the United States population through interviews and physical examinations.
Specifically, the researchers looked at data on 7,827 people that allowed them to assess their demographic data, the length of their telomeres, and where they lived. The research team assessed the amount of greenspace in each person’s neighborhood and how that related to their telomere length. The researchers also accounted for potential confounding variables, such as lifestyle, health history, and substance use. In addition, the researchers identified a suite of other environmental variables that could affect telomere length, such as air quality and redlining maps that track historically segregated neighborhoods.
“We found that the more greenspace people had in their neighborhoods, the longer their telomeres were,” says Hipp, who is also the associate director of social and behavioral science applications at NC State’s Center for Geospatial Analytics. “That was true regardless of race, economic status, whether they were drinkers or smokers, etc.”
“That’s the good news,” Ogletree says. “However, when we accounted for other characteristics of each neighborhood—air pollution, segregation, or ‘deprivation’—the positive effect of the greenspace essentially disappeared. Deprivation, in this context, was an overarching variable that included the neighborhood-level data on income, education, employment status, and housing conditions. In other words, while greenspace seems to help protect telomere length, the harm from other factors appears to offset that protection.”
“Greenspace is tremendously valuable for a community, but it is not enough to overcome systemic racism and the effects of economic segregation and environmental justice challenges on its own,” says Hipp. “This study drives home the idea that creating greenspace in a community is important, but it’s as crucial—or more crucial—for us to address environmental harms, particularly those tied to systemic racism.”
The paper appears in the journal Science of the Total Environment. Coauthors are from NC State; Montgomery County Parks Department in Maryland the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS); and the University of Calgary.
The work had support from NIEHS via NC State’s Center for Human Health and the Environment.
Source: NC State
