City dwellers who have more exposure to urban green spaces require fewer mental health services, a new study suggests.
For the study, published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, the researchers measured urban greenness with NatureScore, which uses numerous data sets related to factors such as air, noise, and light pollution, parks, and tree canopies to calculate the amount and quality of natural elements for any known address in the United States and several other countries. Scores range from 0-19 points for Nature Deficient to 80-100 for Nature Utopia.
For addresses, they used data on mental health visits aggregated at the ZIP code level from Texas Hospital Outpatient Public Use Data Files from 2014 to mid-2019. The data contained information about patient encounters, including a patient’s age, gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, employment status, poverty level, principal diagnosis, and ZIP code, although no patients were identified.
“The association between exposure to nature and better mental health is well established in the United States and elsewhere, but most studies use just one or two measurements of this exposure,” says Jay Maddock, professor of environmental and occupational health at Texas A&M University.
“Our study was the first to use NatureScore, which provides more complex data, to study the correlation between urban nature exposure and mental health.”
The researchers selected a total of 61,391,400 adult outpatient encounters in Texas cities for depression, bipolar disorders, stress, and anxiety. The sample included data from 1,169 ZIP codes in urban Texas, with a median NatureScore of 85.8. About half of the sample had high NatureScores (80+), and about 22% had NatureScores below 40.
Of these encounters, 63% were women, 30% were 65 years old or older, 54% were non-Hispanic white, and 15% were Hispanic. At the ZIP code level, 27% of the total population had a bachelor’s degree, 58% were employed, 14% lived under poverty, and 17% lacked health insurance coverage. The percentage of those 65 years old and older, white, Hispanic, and employed were higher in areas with a higher NatureScore. In addition, the ZIP codes with a higher NatureScore had lower percentages of people who were Black, living in poverty, or without insurance.
The trend for various mental health encounters decreased as the NatureScore of a neighborhood increased, and the rates of mental health encounters were about 50% lower in neighborhoods with NatureScores over 60. Those who lived in neighborhoods with the two highest NatureScore categories—Nature Rich and Utopia—had significantly lower rates of mental health encounters compared to neighborhoods with the lowest NatureScore category.
“We found that a NatureScore above 40—considered Nature Adequate—seems to be the threshold for good mental health,” Maddock says. “People in these neighborhoods have a 51% lower likelihood of developing depression and a 63 % lower likelihood for developing bipolar disorders.”
Lead author Omar M. Makram notes that these findings could have important implications for urban planning. “Increasing green space in cities could promote well-being and mental health, which is critically important given that more than 22% of the adult population in the United States with a mental health disorder,” he says.
Additional coauthors from the Center for Health and Nature, a collaboration between Texas A&M Health, Houston Methodist, and Texan by Nature, contributed to the study.
Source: Ann Kellett for Texas A&M University
