Zebras, gazelles, and other grazers in the African Serengeti can be more willing to share food and space if they live in areas lions frequent, according to a new study.
Researchers analyzed more than 115,000 camera-trap photos to see where, when, and how often six of the Serengeti’s most abundant grazing species—cape buffalo, gazelle, hartebeest, topi, wildebeest, and zebra—formed mixed-species groups.
“The mixed-species groups occur near places where lions like to hunt, which suggests the grazers are trying to reduce their chances of being killed by predators,” says Lydia Beaudrot, assistant professor of biosciences at Rice University and lead author of the paper in the journal Ecology.
The researchers found mixed-species groups of grazers in 1.9% of the camera-trap photos, which were collected between 2010-2015 in Tanzania’s Serengeti National Park and processed by volunteers for the citizen science website snapshotserengeti.org.
Camera-trap findings combined with information from long-term GPS collar monitoring by the Serengeti Lion Project and satellite imagery showed both the location of hunting areas favored by lions and where and when food was plentiful or scarce for grazers.
“Mixed-species groups were most likely in ‘risky’ places, like woodland habitats and near rocky outcroppings that lions use as viewsheds,” Beaudrot says.
But the threat from lions apparently isn’t the only thing grazers have to consider. “One of the most interesting results is that grazers in mixed-species groups appear to be making a tradeoff between the risk of being eaten and the need to eat,” Beaudrot says.
Grazing trade-offs
Mixed-species groups were less likely to form when plant productivity was low, which suggests there is a foraging cost associated with mixed-species grazing, says coauthor Meredith Palmer, a behavioral ecologist and postdoctoral fellow at Princeton University.
“These animals face a trade-off,” Palmer says. “When different species group together, each individual is less likely to be eaten by a lion than it would be if it were alone or even possibly with its own species.
“But each individual is also foraging, and if they get further apart they don’t have to compete as much for food. As forage becomes more scarce, these animals have to decide whether the extra food they would get from grazing alone is worth the increased danger from lions.”
The study focuses on a longstanding idea in ecology called the “stress gradient hypothesis,” which holds that species are more likely to compete with one another when times are good and more likely to benefit each other when they’re under stress, Beaudrot says.
“The hypothesis is supported by the findings from more than 700 plant studies, but it’s rarely been applied to animals because mixed-species behavior is rare and there typically aren’t enough data about it to draw statistically significant conclusions,” she says.
More sharing in times of high stress
The collaboration began when Beaudrot heard Palmer describe the Snapshot Serengeti database in a talk at the 2018 Gordon Research Conference on Predator-Prey Interactions.
While mixed-species groups had previously been documented in animals, including primates, cetaceans, ungulates, fish, and birds, Palmer and Beaudrot realized that the size of the Snapshot Serengeti camera-trap database would allow them a rare opportunity to not simply observe mixed-species groups but to examine the ecological context within which they occur.
“Our findings partially support the hypothesis,” Beaudrot says. “On the one hand, we found mixed-species groups were more likely to occur when stress was high because of predators but we also found that mixed-species groups were less likely to form when stress from food scarcity was high, which suggests that stress can also lead to increased competition.”
She and Palmer say there are also plenty of questions to address with follow-up research, including how mixed-species groups better protects grazers from lions.
“The larger groups could provide more warning of lions because there are more eyes for vigilance, or that individual species in the group benefit from the behavior of other species in a way that they wouldn’t if they had grazed on their own,” Palmer says.
“Or it could simply be that the odds of any one individual being eaten go down if it’s part of a larger group. Our study can’t differentiate between any of those mechanisms.”
Additional coauthors are from Rice, Princeton, Wake Forest University, and the University of Minnesota. The National Science Foundation and the National Geographic Society funded the work.
Source: Rice University
