Researchers have sequenced the genome of several species of columbine flowers, and one species of the related false columbine. Their findings confirm several hypotheses about the flower, but also reveal a surprise in the form of a truly bizarre chromosome.
Columbines’ vivid colors and iconic spurs make them a welcome sight in gardens and mountain meadows across the northern hemisphere.
For decades, the flowers have also served as an ideal model group for studying evolution and ecology. Their diverse flower shapes evolved in response to different pollinators, and their ability to hybridize lends itself toward genetic experiments.
Columbines split from their sister group, the false columbines, when they developed petal spurs around 7 million years ago—relatively recently in evolutionary terms. Different species have adapted to different pollinators by altering the shape and color of their spurs, and thus the columbine genus has become fairly diverse, counting roughly 70 species to date.
“Because this huge amount of diversity developed in a relatively short amount of time, it allows us to investigate the types of genetic changes that happen when organisms become new species,” says Evangeline Ballerini, an evolutionary geneticist and research associate in the ecology, evolution, and marine biology department at the University of California, Santa Barbara and coauthor of the paper, which appears in eLife.
Puzzle pieces
Despite their morphological diversity, columbine species are remarkably similar genetically. This suggests they evolved quickly and have a history of interbreeding. Usually this would drive the species toward recombining, but different columbines still retain their characteristic distinctions.
The differences in the flowers’ spurs reinforce the species distinctions. If one species has flowers optimized for hummingbirds and another is adapted for bees, they don’t form hybrids in nature because the pollinators don’t go between them, explains Scott Hodges, a professor and vice chair in the ecology, evolution, and marine biology department. A major goal of Hodges’s lab is to identify the genomic differences responsible for these changes associated with different pollinators.
These studies will be far more reliable now that researchers have assembled a reference genome for columbines. Sequencing a genome is more like putting together a puzzle than reading a book.
The sequencing process requires breaking up DNA into lots of little bits whose order gets mixed up. Like any puzzle, putting these bits back together in the right order can prove challenging without a reference. The standard practice to construct a reference genome is to sequence a single individual very thoroughly, in this case a cultivar of Colorado’s state flower.
Inefficient genes
Using a number of additional experiments and techniques, scientists can painstakingly determine the order in which these fragments belong. Once this reference sequence order is established, it can function like the picture on a puzzle box, making it much easier to put together additional puzzles, even if some of the pieces have slightly different images than the original. As the many species of columbine are genetically so similar, researchers can use this one reference for many closely related species.
After they assembled the reference, the researchers sequenced 10 additional columbine species from across the northern hemisphere to begin exploring how and where their genomes differed from one another. Hodges’ team is now working on creating a false columbine reference genome. This should enable a more accurate reconstruction for the three species in that genus, two of which scientists only discovered in 2017.
The researchers were most surprised by the results they obtained from the columbines’ fourth chromosome. Chromosome four has a far higher proportion of shared polymorphisms—genes with multiple variants—among columbine species than any of the groups’ other chromosomes, Hodges says.
It also has fewer genes, which are generally expressed at lower levels. What’s more, many of these genes likely have problems which make them inefficient or ineffective.
“Many of the genes on chromosome four just don’t seem to work very well,” Hodges says, adding that researchers had never seen these patterns across a single chromosome.
“We sequenced this genome so that we could understand the genetics of ecological and floral morphology differences,” he says. “It just happened that along the way we discovered this completely bizarre chromosome.”
Unusual patterns
A large section of the chromosome also contains repeated instructions for making ribosomes. Ribosomes synthesize proteins, so most organisms have multiple copies of these genes. This enables them to synthesize many ribosomes simultaneously. But columbines are among the roughly 3.5 percent of plants that have these ribosomal repeats near the middle of their chromosomes, rather than toward the ends.
They are the first plants with this feature to have their genome sequenced, Hodges says. “We didn’t know this when we first sequenced columbines, it just turns out that they have this unusual pattern of the ribosomal repeat.”
The fourth chromosome of the false columbine also showed some of the peculiarities found in columbines, so this pattern likely occurred before the split.
“Understanding how many related taxa have this pattern will help us determine when it arose,” Hodges says. “Then we could start determining what other genomic changes accompanied its origin.” In that light, the team’s current effort to sequence the genomes of the false columbines should help them make sense of this odd chromosome.
Hodges’s team has continued to construct the genomes of other columbines in addition to their new work on false columbines. This information will enable scientists to more directly investigate the genetics and evolution of this group of plants.
In particular, Ballerini plans to explore the genetic changes that allowed the development of the columbines’ complex tubular flower petals from the flat petals of their ancestors.
“We had plenty of lines of inquiry going into this study,” she says. “Now there’s even more.”
Source: UC Santa Barbara
