The largest and smallest mammals in the Caribbean have been the most vulnerable to extinction, a new study shows.
The findings, published in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B, help predict future extinction risk and inform the conservation strategies needed to prevent future biodiversity loss.
Most past studies have found that larger mammals go extinct more often, so the new findings are unusual. The researchers looked at past extinction patterns across the Caribbean mammal fauna to understand the factors that predispose species to extinction. With mammal extinction, what researchers found is that size does indeed matter in life.
The islands of the Caribbean have long been a source of fascination for scientists and conservationists. They were once home to a diverse array of land mammals including sloths, primates, unusual insectivores, and giant rodents, but the arrival of different waves of human colonists from around 6,000 years ago onwards instigated the largest series of human-caused mammal extinctions since the end of the last Ice Age.
Only 11 native Caribbean rodents and two insectivores still survive today–including the two solenodons, large shrew-like mammals that have the unique ability to inject venom into their prey using modified grooved teeth.
Both solenodon species are the only representatives of an ancient mammalian lineage that diverged from the ancestors of all other living mammals during the time of the dinosaurs, approximately 76 million years ago.
Liliana M. Dávalos, a professor in the ecology and evolution department at Stony Brook University, designed and completed the statistical analyses that led to the findings. Carrying out the study at the level of mammal populations instead of species, allowed the team’s methods to account for the effect of varying environmental conditions across different islands on species’ chances of survival.
Conducting a huge-scale analysis that included records of extinction patterns for 219 land mammal populations across 118 Caribbean islands, the study went beyond previous research into Caribbean mammal extinctions, which has largely focused on reconstructing last-occurrence dates for extinct species and matching them with specific historical events.
The current study instead sought to identify wider ecological patterns—such as the relationship between body mass and extinction risk—that influence a mammal’s chance of survival in response to human activities.
They found that medium-sized Caribbean mammals—like the solenodons—have been less sensitive to extinction compared to both their smaller and larger counterparts.
The overall discovery will likely reflect the fact that larger species were more vulnerable to past human hunting, whereas smaller species were more vulnerable to predation or competition from species such as mongooses and rats.
“To answer questions such as ‘what traits predispose species to survival?’ or ‘what island features are associated with extinction?’ we studied each population on an island as a natural experiment,” Dávalos says.
“With enough of them, patterns that have often been discussed but couldn’t quantify start to emerge. Without the large database of many natural experiments in the Caribbean and powerful computing approaches, there is no way to answer these questions,” Dávalos says.
“The analyses also showed that Caribbean mammals of all sizes were less likely to survive on the earliest-colonized islands by humans and more likely to survive on tiny, low-elevation offshore islands, meaning that their future survival could be at risk from climate change and rising sea levels unless measures are put in place to protect these vital natural refuges.”
“Preventing the extinction of highly endangered species requires an awareness of not only the immediate risks to their survival, but also the history of human-caused biodiversity loss—and the unique insights that the past can provide about species’ vulnerability or resilience under differing conditions,” says Samuel Turvey of the Zoological Society of London.
“The Caribbean islands are home to unique mammalian biodiversity, which has tragically been almost completely wiped out by past human activities. Our study clearly highlights the importance of learning from the past to make the future better—we must use information from the historical, archaeological and recent fossil records to inform current-day conservation, or else we risk losing these remarkable species forever.”
The National Science Foundation funded the work.
Source: Stony Brook University
