Income and race-based disparities are significant obstacles to the families of kids with autism accessing early intervention programs, a new study shows.
Researchers found that, despite a federal mandate requiring access to early intervention programs (EIP) for children with disabilities, fewer than half of children with autism in four New Jersey counties received services before 36 months of age.
“For infants and toddlers on the autism spectrum, early intervention is important for improved later-life outcomes,” says Josephine Shenouda, an adjunct professor at the Rutgers School of Public Health and lead author of the study published in JAMA Pediatrics. “We wanted to understand the level of early intervention participation among children with autism.”
In the US, access to EIP for young children is mandated by law as part of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. However, the extent to which children with autism participate in early intervention programs had not previously been measured.
Shenouda and her colleagues analyzed data collected between 2006 and 2016 by the New Jersey Autism Study, an autism spectrum disorder (ASD) monitoring system developed and maintained by researchers at Rutgers New Jersey Medical School.
By analyzing the medical and special education records of 23,441 children in Essex, Hudson, Ocean, and Union counties, the researchers identified 4,050 8-year-olds with autism spectrum disorder. Fewer than half (1,887; 47%) had received EIP services.
The researchers linked cases to data representing different indicators of wealth, including median household income, and found that ASD children residing in affluent areas were 80% more likely to receive EIP services than children residing in disadvantaged areas. Black and Hispanic children also were less likely to participate in EIP.
While the study was conducted in New Jersey metropolitan areas, Shenouda says the findings have important implications nationwide.
“New Jersey is known as an epicenter of autism, but it also has many resources for autism detection and treatment,” she says. “If only half of the children with autism in our study area are getting early interventions, chances are the disparities are even more pronounced in other communities and regions with fewer services.”
There may be multiple reasons why children from disadvantaged and minority areas aren’t enrolled in EIP, such as lower rates of ASD screening or less likely follow-through with recommendations, Shenouda says. In either case, focused outreach can help increase EIP referrals and participation.
“With autism prevalence estimates approaching 7% in some areas, we need universal autism screening between 18 and 36 months and enhanced support for the early intervention system. These actions will reduce economic and race-based disparities in autism identification and care.”
Source: Rutgers University
