The potable water municipalities use to recharge an aquifer can become contaminated with dangerous levels of arsenic, new research shows.
To replenish groundwater, many municipalities inject reclaimed water into depleted aquifers. Secondary wastewater treatment has purified the injected water, and, in some cases, the water has been treated through tertiary processes and can be clean enough to drink directly.
The original water in the aquifer was chemically stable, in equilibrium with the surrounding rocks, and natural processes (water infiltration) had slowly recharged it. However, when people consume more groundwater than the natural processes can restore, engineered recharging with purified, reclaimed water is necessary. Unfortunately, over time, the reclaimed water sometimes becomes contaminated.
In a managed aquifer recharge, “we continuously draw down the aquifer, but we never refill it enough,” says Young-Shin Jun, professor of energy, environmental, and chemical engineering at the McKelvey School of Engineering at Washington University in St. Louis.
“Our population can grow quickly and our lifestyle becomes more water dependent but the natural refilling process is slow,” she says. ” So water management practice has engineered a way to inject water to compensate for our consumption and achieve environmental sustainability.”
Keeping aquifers full is important for a few reasons. On the coasts, salty seawater can fill a depleted aquifer, creating a disastrous situation for the ecosystem and crops that the aquifer feeds. And, if the depleted zone remains empty, sinkholes can occur and the land may subside. Thus, refilling aquifers to provide drinking water is a standard practice in places from California to Florida.
But about 10 years ago, when working on managed aquifer recharge with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Jun encountered a puzzling situation.
“When we injected the water, it was good,” she says, “but when we withdrew it, it was bad, tainted with arsenic. What was wrong?”
It turned out that although the water being injected into the aquifer was usually clean enough to drink, it was bringing something new to the aquifer: oxygen.
“By injecting reclaimed water, we are triggering oxidative dissolution of sulfide minerals in the aquifer, which were stable at low oxygen levels,” she says. In particular, she looked at arsenopyrite (FeAsS), a mineral that dissolves into iron, sulfur, and, crucially, arsenic. Before the arsenic can reach problematic levels, however, another reaction takes place.
“The iron precipitates into iron oxides or hydroxides,” Jun says. The arsenic adsorbs, or adheres, to the iron oxides or hydroxides, which are insoluble, keeping arsenic out of the water.
There is, however, another important factor.
Dissolved organic matter (DOM)—compounds that contain carbon—changes the situation drastically. “With high levels of organic compounds, we found the precipitation reaction is suppressed,” Jun says. When precipitation of iron oxides or hydroxides is suppressed, the arsenic does not adsorb sufficiently. Instead, it remains available in the water.
Jun is quick to emphasize that this is more than an experimental exercise in laboratory exercise. “This is not a potential future problem,” she says, noting that using reclaimed water is actual practice right now.
“When thinking about water reclamation from aquifers, we need to consider the roles of organic matter,” Jun says.
“We have to take into account the DOMs in injected water to make sure they do not trigger more mobilization of toxins,” Jun says. “The roles of DOMs in managed aquifer recharge should be included in the predictive models. Knowing how water chemistry alters the chemical reactions in an aquifer will enable us to fully utilize the water, rather than discarding it as waste.
“Please keep in mind that there is only one kind of water in the world,” she says.
“All water—drinking water, seawater, groundwater, wastewater, stormwater, greywater, and more—is simply ‘water.’ Keeping it safe and sustainable is our continuing homework.”
Support for the work came from the National Science Foundation, and the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences.
The research was published in Environmental Science and Technology.
