In a new comparison of popular diets, keto and paleo diets scored among the lowest for overall nutritional quality and the highest on carbon emissions.
The keto diet, which prioritizes high amounts of fat and low amounts of carbs, was estimated to generate almost 3 kg of carbon dioxide for every 1,000 calories consumed. The paleo diet, which eschews grains and beans in favor of meats, nuts, and vegetables, received the next lowest diet quality score and also had a high carbon footprint, at 2.6 kg of carbon dioxide per 1,000 calories.
For the study, published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, researchers compiled diet quality scores using data from more than 16,000 adult diets collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. They assigned individual diets point values based on the federal Healthy Eating Index and calculated average scores for those eating each type of diet.
While researchers have examined the nutritional impact of keto and paleo diets, this is the first study to measure the carbon footprints of each diet as consumed by US adults and compare them to other common diets, says senior author Diego Rose, professor and nutrition program director at Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine.
“We suspected the negative climate impacts because they’re meat-centric, but no one had really compared all these diets—as they are chosen by individuals, instead of prescribed by experts—to each other using a common framework,” he says.
On the other end of the spectrum, a vegan diet was found to have the least impact on climate, generating 0.7 kg of carbon dioxide per 1,000 calories consumed, less than a quarter of the impact of the keto diet. The vegan diet was followed by vegetarian and pescatarian diets in increasing impact.
The pescatarian diet scored highest on nutritional quality of the diets analyzed, with vegetarian and vegan diets following behind.
The omnivore diet—the most common diet, represented by 86% of survey participants—sat squarely in the middle of the pack of both quality and sustainability. Based on the findings, if a third of those on omnivore diets began eating a vegetarian diet, on average for any given day, it would be equivalent to eliminating 340 million passenger vehicle miles.
Notably, however, when those on omnivorous diets opted for the plant-forward Mediterranean or fatty meat-limiting DASH diet versions, both carbon footprints and nutritional quality scores improved.
“Climate change is arguably one of the most pressing problems of our time, and a lot of people are interested in moving to a plant-based diet,” Rose says. “Based on our results, that would reduce your footprint and be generally healthy. Our research also shows there’s a way to improve your health and footprint without giving up meat entirely.”
A 2021 United Nations-backed study found that 34% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the food system. The major share of those emissions come from food production, with beef being responsible for 8-10 times more emissions than chicken production and over 20 times more emissions than nut and legume production.
While the environmental impacts of specific foods have been studied extensively, Rose says this study was important because “it considers how individuals select popular diets that are composed of a wide variety of foods.”
Going forward, Rose still has questions about how to encourage eating habits that are better for people and the planet.
“I think the next question is how would different policies affect outcomes and how could those move us toward healthier, more environmentally friendly diets?” Rose says.
Source: Tulane University
