Women who’ve received funds to pay for an abortion but cannot access abortion in their home states travel roughly 10 times farther for the procedure than women who don’t have to go out of state, new research indicates.
On average, abortion fund recipients who receive funds from advocacy organizations to help pay for abortion costs travel close to 172 miles from their homes to a health care provider for the procedures.
This distance has nearly doubled over a recent period that parallels the unprecedented policy-based restrictions that began after the 2010 midterm elections, according to Gretchen Ely, an associate professor in the University at Buffalo School of Social Work.
For these low-income patients, getting the money to pay for a procedure can take weeks or even months…
Ely analyzed about 4,000 cases from 2010 to 2015 from the National Network of Abortion Funds (NNAF), the main umbrella organization for 70 independent advocacy organizations that help patients pay for the cost of an abortion by pledging funds directly to health care providers. The NNAF also maintains its own fund, the Tiller Memorial Fund, which served as the data source for the study.
Federal law prohibits funding abortions through programs like Medicaid, but individual states can choose to expand Medicaid to cover abortion care for Medicaid-eligible patients.
More than 80 percent of the recipients of abortion funding assistance in this study lived in states, mostly in the geographic southeastern US, that had not expanded Medicaid to cover abortion costs. Moreover, assistance recipients living in non-expanded states were almost three times more likely to have to travel out of state for abortion care.
Funds help vulnerable women pay for abortions
For these low-income patients, getting the money to pay for a procedure can take weeks or even months, forcing patients to travel farther to the limited providers who offer services for later-stage pregnancies. In fact, patients in the later stages of pregnancy travel an average of three times farther for their procedures that those who received a pledge for an abortion in the first trimester, according to the study’s results.
“This suggests they’re either having problems accessing a provider or they are having difficulty getting the money to pay for an abortion, pushing the procedure closer to the second trimester,” says Ely.
“Some state lawmakers believe that policy-based barriers on abortion will minimize the procedure’s frequency, but these restrictions instead are apparently creating delays that push abortions into the second trimester, where they are riskier and more expensive,” she says.
“Policy makers professing to be ‘pro-life’ may want to consider supporting access to abortion at the earliest stages of pregnancy when less development and expense is involved.”
Ely says the situation is “dire” for vulnerable women.
Abortion booklets from states are misinforming women
“The data present a compelling case for a compassionate public health policy regardless of your feelings about this procedure,” she says.
The results of Ely’s analysis appear in the International Journal of Sexual Health.
Source: University at Buffalo
